ARTIFICIAL
preservatives used in many processed foods could increase the risk of inflammatory
bowel diseases and metabolic disorders, according to research published on
February 25, 2015 in Nature.
In a study done in mice, chemicals known as emulsifiers were found to
alter the make-up of bacteria in the colon — the first time that these
additives have been shown to affect health directly.
About 15 different emulsifiers are commonly used in processed Western
foods for purposes such as smoothing the texture of ice cream and preventing
mayonnaise from separating. Regulatory agencies such as the US Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) rule that emulsifiers are “generally regarded as safe”,
because there is no evidence that they increase the risk of cancer or have
toxic effects in mammals.
But when immunologist Andrew Gewirtz at Georgia State University in
Atlanta and his colleagues fed common emulsifiers carboxymethylcellulose and
polysorbate-80 to mice, they found evidence that the chemicals affected the
animals’ health. Although their diet was not otherwise changed, healthy mice
whose water contained the chemicals became obese and developed metabolic
problems such as glucose intolerance. In mice genetically engineered to be
prone to inflammatory gut diseases, emulsifiers also seemed to increase the
severity and frequency with which the animals developed inflammatory bowel
disease.
The most severe health effects were seen in mice that consumed the
chemicals at a level similar to a person whose diet consists of only ice cream,
says Gewirtz. But the researchers saw effects even at one-tenth of the
concentration of emulsifiers that the FDA allows in a food product.
To understand why emulsifiers affected the health of mice, researchers analyzed bacteria from the animals’ colons. They found less diversity in the
microbial species than in healthy mice, and found evidence that the microbes
had migrated closer the cells lining the gut. Gewirtz and his colleagues
suspect that the emulsifiers can break down the heavy mucus that lines the
mammalian gut and prevents bacteria from coming into contact with gut cells. If
this happens, the bacteria cause inflammation in the gut, which can also lead
to changes in metabolism.
Gewirtz says that previous studies may have missed these links because
newly developed food additives are tested in large swathes of the population,
masking any subtle effects in people whose genetics or gut-microbe composition
predispose them to these diseases. For regulators, he says, “the idea that a
subset of the population may be sensitive isn’t on the radar.”
This lack of specificity could explain why nutritionists and
public-health agencies are constantly revising their dietary guidelines — just
this month, for example, an advisory council to the US government recommended
eliminating guidelines on cholesterol consumption.
“If you look over a 50-year perspective, you would see that the
recommendations go back and forth, back and forth,” says immunologist Eran
Elinav of the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, Israel. “No one is
lying or cheating, many of these studies are well-designed studies, but they
all look at large populations.”
Last year, Elinav and computational biologist Eran Segal, a
colleague at the Weizmann Institute, found that artificial sweeteners such as
saccharin can cause metabolic diseases such as obesity and diabetes by changing
the make-up of bacteria in the gut in both mice and humans. They are now
compiling a database of genetic and microbiome data from about 1,000
volunteers, measuring their metabolic response to different test foods. They
hope that this will eventually allow nutritionists to make specific dietary
recommendations for individuals based on these parameters.
Elinav and Segal hope to incorporate consumption of emulsifiers,
sweeteners and other artificial additives into their study, but caution that
there are many components to inflammatory and metabolic diseases. “This is for
sure not the only driving factor” for inflammatory bowel disease, Elinav says.
Gewirtz says that many more human and animal studies need to be
completed before regulatory agencies would consider changing how additives are
approved — after all, removing preservatives from foods would cause them to rot
sooner, posing a different health risk. He hopes to do a study in humans soon
and is already collecting biopsies from surgery patients to study where
different bacteria live in the colon.
But the findings have been enough to convince Gewirtz and co-author
Benoit Chassaing, a microbiologist at Georgia State, to start checking the labels
of the foods they buy, although both say they are not trying to eliminate
emulsifiers entirely. It is not easy to find emulsifier-free food, Gewirtz
says, and products marketed as ‘organic’ are just as likely to contain these
agents. “When it comes to people making their own decisions, between our
studies and others out there, it’s better to eat less processed food,” he says.
No comments:
Post a Comment